<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mel and Steve's Blog &#187; Communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ldrteam.com/blog/tag/communication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ldrteam.com/blog</link>
	<description>Equipping Leaders and Empowering Churches</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 20:55:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Clarity of Communication</title>
		<link>http://www.ldrteam.com/blog/clarity-of-communication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ldrteam.com/blog/clarity-of-communication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Idea Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldrteam.com/blog/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lake Superior State University in Michigan publishes a list of words each year they think should be eliminated because of overuse, mis-use or general uselessness. http://www.lssu.edu/banished/current.php
This year’s list includes:

“shovel-ready”
“transparent/transparency”
“czar”
“friend” as a verb
“teachable moment”
“in these economic times”
“stimulus”
“toxic assets”
“to big to fail”
“app”
Combination of words like “sexting”, “bromance”, and “chiaxin”
All versions of “tweets”, “tweetaholic”, “retweet” “twitterature” &#38; “twittersphere”

2009’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lake Superior State University in Michigan publishes a list of words each year they think should be eliminated because of overuse, mis-use or general uselessness. <a href="http://www.lssu.edu/banished/current.php">http://www.lssu.edu/banished/current.php</a></p>
<p>This year’s list includes:</p>
<ul>
<li>“shovel-ready”</li>
<li>“transparent/transparency”</li>
<li>“czar”</li>
<li>“friend” as a verb</li>
<li>“teachable moment”</li>
<li>“in these economic times”</li>
<li>“stimulus”</li>
<li>“toxic assets”</li>
<li>“to big to fail”</li>
<li>“app”</li>
<li>Combination of words like “sexting”, “bromance”, and “chiaxin”</li>
<li>All versions of “tweets”, “tweetaholic”, “retweet” “twitterature” &amp; “twittersphere”</li>
</ul>
<p>2009’s list included:</p>
<ul>
<li>Green</li>
<li>Bailout</li>
<li>Icon or iconic</li>
<li>Game changer</li>
<li>Not so much</li>
<li>It’s that time of year</li>
</ul>
<p>2008’’s list included:</p>
<ul>
<li>Perfect storm</li>
<li>Organic</li>
<li>Webinar</li>
<li>Wordsmith</li>
<li>Surge</li>
<li>Decimated</li>
<li>Under the bus</li>
</ul>
<p>While we may not agree with their lists, we must all be aware that words change and lose their meaning over time. This is one of the reasons why we must occasionally review things we publish to see if they still have clarity or have lost impact or meaning.</p>
<p>It is also why we need to record and listen to ourselves periodically, to see if we are using words that no longer have meaning or clarity. Just because something is technically correct, does not mean it has clarity or impact on the listener.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ldrteam.com/blog/clarity-of-communication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Irritating Phrases</title>
		<link>http://www.ldrteam.com/blog/most-irritating-phrases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ldrteam.com/blog/most-irritating-phrases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Idea Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Habits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldrteam.com/blog/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The  following is a re-post from the blog of Brian Dolleman who got it from of James Emery White&#8230;
Top Ten  Irritating Phrases
Researchers at Oxford University have compiled the top  ten most irritating phrases.
At the end of the day, such lists are fairly  unique. I personally, at this moment in time, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="D036D3B9-446F-4592-B900-A5BC91584C81_description">The  following is a re-post from the blog of Brian Dolleman who got it from of James Emery White&#8230;</p>
<p>Top Ten  Irritating Phrases</p>
<p>Researchers at Oxford University have compiled the top  ten most irritating phrases.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, such lists are fairly  unique. I personally, at this moment in time, and with all due respect,  absolutely agree with their list. It’s a nightmare to hear these phrases, and I  know that when I have thought of using them, I shouldn’t of. Nonetheless, you  hear them 24/7, even when stopping shouldn’t be rocket science.</p>
<p>Here they  are in a less irritating form:</p>
<p>1. At the end of the day<br />
2. Fairly  unique<br />
3. I personally<br />
4. At this moment in time<br />
5. With all due  respect<br />
6. Absolutely<br />
7. It’s a nightmare<br />
8. Shouldn’t of<br />
9.  24/7<br />
10. It’s not rocket science</p>
<p>Not quite making the top ten, but  coming close, was the expressions “synergy,” “literally,” and  “ironically.”</p>
<p>Revealed in the book A Damp Squid, named after the mistake  of confusing a squid with a squib (which is a type of firework), author Jeremy  Butterfield says “We grow tired of anything that is repeated too often – an  anecdote, a joke, a mannerism – and the same seems to happen with some  language.”</p>
<p>Agreed.</p>
<p>So here’s my “top five” list of irritating  phrases circulating around Christianity, leaving those who post on this on <a href="http://www.serioustimes.com/">www.serioustimes.com</a> to suggest those  that might round it out to ten:</p>
<p>5. “Must be providential.” Trotted out  every time anything happens good or bad, often in ways that trivialize the true  nature of God’s sovereignty and conveys a fatalism of the worst sort.</p>
<p>4.  “I need to go where I’m fed.” The ultimate in spiritual narcissism and the  deepest reflection of a consumer faith. We can throw in “I didn’t get anything  out of it” (applied to worship) and “I need to be ministered to.”</p>
<p>3. “I’m  Reformed.” Code used by those who claim the entire Reformation for themselves  and their embrace of Calvinism. Nothing against Calvin, but it is a ridiculous  reduction of the Reformation’s mosaic and the many streams of Protestantism that  flowed from its dynamic.</p>
<p>2. “Postmodern.” So overused, and misused, that  it’s become specious. When a single word can refer to a philosophy (such as  offered by Lyotard), an era of history (meaning that which follows the modern  era), and a style of ministry, then we need some more words.</p>
<p>1.  “Emergent.” Do I even have to explain selecting this one?</p>
<p>Looking forward  to yours…..</p>
<p>James Emery White</p>
<p>Sources</p>
<p>“Oxford compiles  list of top ten irritating phrases,” Charlotte Bailey, Telegraph.co.uk, November  8, 2008. Website</p>
<p>A Damp Squid: The English Language Laid Bare by Jeremy  Butterfield.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ldrteam.com/blog/most-irritating-phrases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
